Skip to content
Demographic Change in Early Childhood Education: Opportunities, Risks, and the Question of Trust

When

24. Sep­tem­ber 2026 
3:00 pm — 5:00 pm 

On Sep­tem­ber 24, 2026, the GeDAB net­work hos­ted an expert dis­cus­sion titled “What Oppor­tu­ni­ties and Risks Does Demo­gra­phic Change Pre­sent for Equi­ta­ble Access to Early Child­hood Edu­ca­tion?” We deli­bera­tely invi­ted experts with hands-on expe­ri­ence who them­sel­ves have ties to the immi­grant com­mu­nity. All too often, peo­ple talk about them ins­tead of with them, yet they are the ones who, dra­wing on their own expe­ri­en­ces and daily prac­tice, can best pro­vide insights which eit­her enables or hin­ders equi­ta­ble access to early child­hood education.

Access to early child­hood edu­ca­tion in Ger­many remains struc­tu­rally une­qual. Various bar­riers pre­vent all child­ren from secu­ring a spot in day­care. At the same time, the cur­rent decline in birth rates is chan­ging the land­scape: where day­care spots were pre­viously in short sup­ply, new oppor­tu­ni­ties are emer­ging. Against this back­drop, we addres­sed the ques­tion: Does this change actually lead to grea­ter equa­lity of oppor­tu­nity, or are exis­ting sel­ec­tion mecha­nisms merely shifting?

Access beg­ins with trust

In her pre­sen­ta­tion, “Access Through Trust—Intercultural Open­ness in Early Child­hood Edu­ca­tion,” Pınar Çetik from the Ger­man Islam Aca­demy gave us insight into how clo­sely access and trust are linked.

In her pre­sen­ta­tion, it became clear that even small details can deter­mine whe­ther fami­lies feel wel­come: whe­ther a name is pro­no­un­ced cor­rectly, whe­ther wel­come infor­ma­tion is dis­played in mul­ti­ple lan­guages, or whe­ther a team is diverse. Cen­tral to this was the motto “Atti­tude, not back­ground.” This requi­res inter­cul­tu­ral com­pe­ten­cies and anti-bias approa­ches based on the “Anti-Bias Edu­ca­tion and Upbrin­ging” model deve­lo­ped by Kin­der­wel­ten. Respon­si­bi­lity for this must not rest solely on indi­vi­dual team mem­bers. It needs to be struc­tu­rally embedded in poli­cies, trai­ning, and the day-to-day ope­ra­ti­ons of the day­care center.

Struc­tures matter—not just good intentions

These fin­dings were con­firmed and expan­ded upon by Iman Rei­mann, direc­tor of the Regen­bo­gen­kids day­care cen­ter, who drew on more than 20 years of prac­ti­cal experience.

In her pre­sen­ta­tion, it became clear just how much exter­nal struc­tures deter­mine whe­ther a genuine part­ner­ship with fami­lies in edu­ca­tion and child-rea­ring is even pos­si­ble in ever­y­day life. One chall­enge she par­ti­cu­larly high­ligh­ted con­cerns wide­spread assump­ti­ons about par­ents: If a parent is hastily labe­led as “hard to reach” or “unin­te­res­ted,” the ques­tion of whe­ther the actual obs­ta­cle might ins­tead be the way the parent is approa­ched, whe­ther the timing of a parent-tea­cher con­fe­rence or the lack of a trans­la­tion is the real obs­ta­cle. It is important to shift the per­spec­tive: Ins­tead of asking what steps fami­lies must take, the focus should be on what con­di­ti­ons are neces­sary for an effec­tive part­ner­ship and how edu­ca­tio­nal pro­fes­sio­nals can ensure these con­di­ti­ons are met. To do this, insti­tu­ti­ons need time, per­son­nel, and appro­priate pro­fes­sio­nal development.

What True Par­ti­ci­pa­tion Requires

A key fin­ding of the expert dis­cus­sion was the­r­e­fore that demo­gra­phic change does not auto­ma­ti­cally lead to grea­ter equa­lity of oppor­tu­nity. While the decli­ning birth rate means there are more available day­care spots, this does not auto­ma­ti­cally result in more child­ren atten­ding day­care. Struc­tu­ral chan­ges are nee­ded to take advan­tage of the oppor­tu­ni­ties this shift offers.

This includes smal­ler group sizes, so that the needs and con­cerns of indi­vi­dual child­ren can be addres­sed more effec­tively, as well as time and infor­ma­tio­nal resour­ces for early child­hood edu­ca­tors. Equally important are diverse teams that reflect the diver­sity of fami­lies, and easy access to lan­guage inter­pre­ters, so that com­mu­ni­ca­tion does not depend on indi­vi­du­als having to impro­vise. Fami­lies also need low-bar­rier com­plaint pro­ce­du­res that are embedded in a genuine cul­ture of feed­back, where feed­back is wel­co­med and leads to change. Last but not least, it is important to streng­then trust in com­mu­ni­ties that, just a few years ago, were met with clo­sed doors. This trust does not arise on its own: govern­ment agen­cies, orga­niza­ti­ons, and insti­tu­ti­ons must actively build it.

We would like to express our sin­cere thanks for the insightful con­tri­bu­ti­ons and the sti­mu­la­ting dis­cus­sion. We would also like to thank all par­ti­ci­pants for their sug­ges­ti­ons, their exper­tise, and the open exch­ange of ideas.